en
Online Services Online services
Shipping International Trade English Litigation International Commercial Arbitration Gafta and FOSFA Arbitration Corporate and M&A Sanctions & Compliance Investment Arbitration WTO / Trade Regulation

English Litigation

Fortior Law (UK) LLP is authorised by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and conducts litigation in England and Wales, specifically in the Commercial Court in London. 

We handle complex multi-jurisdictional disputes mostly in the areas of commodity trading, finance, shipping, shareholders disputes and civil fraud.

We have developed good working relationships with barristers from various chambers, including those at the top of the game and also more cost-effective options.

Danil Hristich Head of practice
Vitaliy Kozachenko
Rusudan Gergauli
Youjin Jo
Dmitry Zagorodnyuk
Galyna Carey
Danil Hristich
Partner
Team members
Danil Hristich Vitaliy Kozachenko Rusudan Gergauli Youjin Jo Dmitry Zagorodnyuk Galyna Carey
Services
Commercial litigation
Corporate litigation
Fraud and asset recovery
Funding and financing dispute resolution
Restructuring and insolvency
Do you have a problem that we can help you with?
Yes
Publications
28.11.2022 Force majeure cannot be invoked if it could have been overcome

Force majeure cannot be invoked if it could have been overcome

Судовладелец не мог ссылаться на форс-мажор, так как не попытался преодолеть его. Преодолеть форс-мажор можно было, согласившись принять оплату в евро, а не в долларах США (как было предусмотрено чартером). Такое решения вынес Апелляционный Суд по делу MUR Shipping BV v RTI Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 1406, поддержав решение арбитража LMAA и отменив решение Высокого Суда Лондона. Learn more
07.07.2022 Enforcement of Judgments and Arbitral Awards in England and Wales

Enforcement of Judgments and Arbitral Awards in England and Wales

Enforcement strategy should always be considered before proceedings are started. Otherwise, you risk investing a substantial amount of money in litigation or arbitration, only to realise that despite having the judgment, you can never actually get any money from your opponent. This article starts by outlining possible steps you should consider before commencing proceedings. It then deals with post-award / post-judgment enforcement mechanisms available in England and Wales. Learn more
08.06.2022 English Third Party Debt Orders: How they work and when English courts have jurisdiction

English Third Party Debt Orders: How they work and when English courts have jurisdiction

TPDO is a method of enforcing money judgments. Where a judgment creditor has a judgment against a judgment debtor, and the judgment debtor is owed money by a third party, the judgment creditor can ask the Court to order that the third party pay directly to the judgment creditor. Learn more
25.03.2022 Fortior Law represents successful respondents against a Summary Judgment Application filed by Bank GPB International S.A (a Subsidiary of Gazprombank Moscow)

Fortior Law represents successful respondents against a Summary Judgment Application filed by Bank GPB International S.A (a Subsidiary of Gazprombank Moscow)

Fortior Law represents the successful respondents in the High Court in London against Bank GPB International S.A., a subsidiary of Moscow’s Gazprombank, in the Bank’s application for summary judgment. Judgment was handed down by Mrs Justice Moulder on 24 March 2022 in the case Integral Petroleum S.A. & Ors v Dun & Ors [2022] EWHC 659 (Comm). Learn more
18.03.2022 The parties may imply during negotiations that a contract will be concluded only upon its signing

The parties may imply during negotiations that a contract will be concluded only upon its signing

We analysed the decision in Jamp Pharma Corporation v Unichem Laboratories Limited [2021] EWHC 1712 (Comm), according to which the parties may impliedly agree during negotiations that the contract will be concluded only when it is signed by both parties. In other words, the negotiations may imply that the agreement is "subject to contract", meaning the contact comes into effect only when its terms are set out in a formal document signed by both parties. Learn more
27.01.2021 The Dog That Did Not Bark: When Silence Contributes to Winding-Up

The Dog That Did Not Bark: When Silence Contributes to Winding-Up

In our recent case, Melars Group Ltd, a Maltese company, was wound up by the Companies Court under English law. Learn more
15.09.2020 Vitaliy Kozachenko obtains a worldwide freezing injunction against London Football Exchange and its owners and directors

Vitaliy Kozachenko obtains a worldwide freezing injunction against London Football Exchange and its owners and directors

This article addresses the recent decision of the High Court of Justice in Blockchain Optimization S.A.and Petrochemical Logistics Ltd v LFE Market Ltd, LFE Group Holdings Limited, James (Aka Jim) Aylward, Benjamin Leigh Hunt, White Tiger Global Opportunities Fund and White Tiger Asset Management Ltd [2020] EWHC 2027 (Comm). Learn more
17.06.2020 WFO: limitations on extending relief against third parties to the arbitration agreement

WFO: limitations on extending relief against third parties to the arbitration agreement

This article addresses the decision of the High Court in Trans-Oil International SA v Savoy Trading LP, Ivan Melnykov [2020] EWHC 57 (Comm). Learn more
12.06.2020 Fortior Law obtains a post-judgement freezing order in the High Court in London for the amount of US$4,5 million, and registers a BVI judgment

Fortior Law obtains a post-judgement freezing order in the High Court in London for the amount of US$4,5 million, and registers a BVI judgment

There are cases where a final court judgement does not actually mean that the debtor will reimburse the sums due to the creditor. Learn more
24.04.2020 Contempt of Court: De facto directors found in contempt of Court for their Companies’ failure to comply with Court injunctions

Contempt of Court: De facto directors found in contempt of Court for their Companies’ failure to comply with Court injunctions

This note addresses the recent decision of the High Court in the Integral Petroleum SA v Petrogat FZE and San Trade GMBH and (1) Mr Klaus Sonnenberg, (2) Ms Mahdieh Sanchouli, (3) Mr Hosseinali Sanchouli and (4) Mr Kanybek Beisenov [2020] EWHC 558 (Comm). Learn more
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this website we will assume that you are happy with it.
Ok